Secondary prevention of further episodes of ARF is a priority. Secondary prophylaxis with regular benzathine penicil in G (BPG) is the only RHD control strategy shown to be effective and cost-effective at both community and population levels.
This quick reference guide is derived from theAustralian guideline for prevention, diagnosis and management of acute rheumatic fever and
Although ARF is relatively rare in industrialised
rheumatic heart disease (2nd edn).
countries, in Australia it is a significant illness among Aboriginal people and Torres Strait
Islanders, particularly across central and northern
Australia. Pacific Islanders, and migrants from
countries with a high prevalence of RHD, are also known to be at high risk.
Acute rheumatic fever (ARF) is an il ness caused
by a reaction to a bacterial infection with group
Secondary prevention
A streptococcus (GAS). It causes an acute, generalised inflammatory response and an il ness
Secondary prevention of further episodes of
that targets specific parts of the body, including
ARF is a priority. Secondary prophylaxis with regular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) is the only
the heart, joints, brain and skin. Individuals with ARF are often unwel , have significant joint pain
RHD control strategy shown to be effective and
and require hospitalisation. Despite the dramatic
cost-effective at both community and population
nature of the acute episode, ARF typical y leaves
no lasting damage to the brain, joints or skin,
but can cause persisting heart damage, termed
prophylaxis is determined by age, time since
‘rheumatic heart disease’ (RHD). People who have
the last episode of ARF and potential harm from
had ARF previously are much more likely than the
recurrent ARF, but is likely to be 10 years or more.
wider community to have subsequent episodes.
Recurrences of ARF may cause further cardiac
valve damage. Hence, RHD steadily worsens in
strategy for controlling RHD, and is also simple, cheap and cost-effective, it must be adequately
people who have multiple episodes of ARF.
implemented. Persistent high rates of recurrent ARF in high-risk populations highlight the continued barriers to secondary prevention.
4. Secondary prevention of acute rheumatic fever
The effectiveness of secondary prophylaxis
is impaired by factors that contribute to poor adherence to antibiotic regimens and increased
• strategies aimed at improving the delivery of
incidence rates of ARF. These factors relate to
overcrowded housing, poor access to health
services, limited educational opportunities and poor environmental conditions. Communities
• coordination of available health services
with the highest rates of ARF and RHD are often
• advocacy for necessary and appropriate
the least equipped to deal with the problem.
Antibiotic regimens for secondary prophylaxis Antibiotic Frequency First line BPG Second line (If im route is not possible or refused, adherence should be carefully monitored) Phenoxymethylpenicillin 250 mg (Penicillin V) Following documented penicillin allergy Erythromycin
* Three-weekly BPG may be considered for patients with moderate or severe carditis or a history of valve surgery, who demonstrate good
adherence to less frequent injections, and for those who have confirmed breakthrough ARF, despite full adherence to 4-weekly BPG.
BPG, benzathine penicillin G; im, intramuscular. Measures that may reduce the pain of BPG injections
• Deliver injection very slowly (preferably over
• Warm syringe to room temperature before using
• Distract patient during injection (e.g. with
• Allow alcohol from swab to dry before inserting
• (The addition of 0.5–1.0 mL of 1% lignocaine
• Apply pressure with thumb for 10 sec before
is used elsewhere, but is not recommended
with preloaded syringes currently available in Australia)
The Australian guideline for prevention, diagnosis and management of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease (2nd Edition) Factors that affect the duration of secondary prophylaxis Implication
ARF recurrence is less common between 25–40 years of age,
Presence and severity of RHD
ARF recurrence could be life-threatening in people with moderate
or severe RHD, or in those with a history of valve surgery
Presence of carditis during initial Increases the likelihood of further cardiac damage, should a episode Time elapsed since last episode
ARF recurrences are less common >5 years since last episode
of ARF Socioeconomic circumstances
ARF recurrences are more common in lower socioeconomic groups (particularly related to overcrowded housing)
Background risk of GAS infection ARF recurrences are more common in higher-incidence and ARF within the community Adherence to treatment
Optimised adherence for a few years after the initial episode may provide greater protection from recurrences than offered by poor adherence for many years
Assessment at time of cessation
Evidence of moderate or greater RHD may warrant prolonged
of secondary prophylaxis
rheumatic heart disease 5. Management of
4. Secondary prevention of acute rheumatic feverDuration of secondary prophylaxis Category Definition of category Duration All persons with ARF or RHD†
Minimum 10 years after most recent episode of ARF or until age 21 years (whichever is longer). Status after initial period elapsed: No RHD
No pathological mitral or aortic regurgitation, Discontinue at that time#but may have minor morphological changes to mitral or aortic valves on echocardiography
Mild mitral or aortic regurgitation clinical y and Discontinue at that timeon echocardiography, with no clinical evidence of heart failure, and no evidence of cardiac chamber enlargement on echocardiography
Moderate RHD
• Any valve lesion of moderate severity
clinically (e.g. mild–moderate cardiomegaly and/or mild–moderate heart failure) or on echocardiography
• Mild mitral regurgitation, together with
mild aortic regurgitation clinically or on echocardiography
• Mild or moderate mitral or aortic stenosis
• Any pulmonary or tricuspid valve lesion
co-existing with a left-sided valve lesion
Severe RHD
• Any severe valve lesion clinically (e.g.
moderate to severe cardiomegaly or heart
• Any impending or previous cardiac valve
† Patients >25 years of age who are diagnosed with RHD, without any documented history of prior ARF, should receive prophylaxis until
the age of 35 years. At this time, they should be reassessed to determine whether prophylaxis should be continued. #Decisions to cease secondary prophylaxis should be based on clinical and echocardiographic assessment. *Risk of recurrence is extremely low in people aged >40 years. In some cases, for example, when the patient decides that they want to reduce even a minimal risk of recurrence, prophylaxis may be continued beyond the age of 40 years, or even for life. The Australian guideline for prevention, diagnosis and management of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease (2nd Edition) Improving adherence to secondary
• having local staff members dedicated to
prophylaxis
A variety of factors, mainly sociological, combine
to limit the efficacy of secondary prophylaxis.
• supporting and utilising the expertise,
A major reason for poor adherence in remote
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities
language skills of Aboriginal health workers
is the availability and acceptability of health
services, rather than personal factors, such as
• improving staff awareness of the diagnosis and
injection refusal, pain of injections or a lack of
knowledge or understanding of ARF and RHD.
• taking measures to minimise staff turnover
Adherence is improved when patients feel a
• implementing measures to reduce the pain of
sense of personalised care and ‘belonging’ to the
clinic, and when recall systems extend beyond the boundaries of the community. Procedures requiring endocarditis prophylaxis for patients with RHD
prophylaxis (including the use of registers) are
outlined in the information sheet RHD control
complication of RHD including those with
prosthetic valves. People with prosthetic valves
Strategies to promote continuing adherence
or established RHD, should receive antibiotic
prophylaxis prior to procedures expected to produce bacteraemia (see below).
• routine review and care planning (see below)
Dental, oral and respiratory tract procedures
rheumatic heart disease 5. Management of
Intraligamentary local anaesthetic injections
Initial placement of orthodontic appliances
Surgical repair or fixation of a fractured jaw
4. Secondary prevention of acute rheumatic feverAntibiotic
For patients on long-term penicillin therapy, hypersensitive to penicillin or who have taken penicillin or a related beta-lactam antibiotic more than once in the last month: Clindamycin
(Child: 15 mg/kg, up to 600 mg) 600 mg orally as 1 dose 1 hour before procedure
If unable to take orally Clindamycin
(Child: 15 mg/kg, up to 600 mg) 600 mg iv, over at least 20 mins just before procedure
Or vancomycin
(Child less than 12 years: 30 mg/kg up to 1.5 g) 1.5 g iv by slow infusion, over at least 1 hour just prior to procedure
Or lincomycin
(Child: 15 mg/kg, up to 600 mg) 600 mg iv, over 1 hour before procedure
Or teicoplanin
(Child: 10 mg/kg, up to 400 mg) 400 mg iv, just before the procedure or im 30 mins before procedure
For patients not on long-term penicillin therapy, not hypersensitive to penicillin and who have not taken penicillin or a related beta-lactam antibiotic more than once in the last month: Amoxycillin
(Child: 50 mg/kg up to 2 g) 2 g orally as 1 dose 1 hour prior to the procedure
Or amoxycillin/
(Child: 50 mg/kg up to 2 g) 2 g iv just prior to procedure or im 30 min
ampicillin Genitourinary and gastrointestinal procedures • Surgery of the intestinal mucosa or biliary
• Vaginal delivery in the presence of infection,
or prolonged labour or prolonged rupture of
• Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography
• Surgical procedures of the genitourinary tract
in the presence of infection (e.g. urethral
catheterisation, uterine dilatation and curettage,
abortion, sterilisation and placement or removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices)
Antibiotic Vancomycin
(Child <12 years: 30 mg/kg, up to 1.5 g) 1.5g iv by slow infusion, over at least 1 hour just prior to procedure
Or teicoplanin
(Child: 10 mg/kg up to 400 mg) 400 mg iv just prior to procedure
The Australian guideline for prevention, diagnosis and management of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease (2nd Edition) Recommended routine review and management plan for ARF and RHD Classification Criteria* Review and management plan Frequency† Priority 1 (severe)¥ Priority 2 (moderate)
Within 3 months of diagnosis, then 6 monthly
Refer to Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotics 2010Priority 3 4. Secondary prevention of acute rheumatic feverClassification Criteria* Review and management plan Frequency†
Refer to Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotics 2010Priority 4 (inactive)
whom secondary prophylaxis has been ceased
Additional considerations surgery
have not presented within 3 days of due injection
to 2–3 weeks, or arrangements made with other service providers in advance
* Serial echocardiographic assessments are required in the long-term management of RHD as an essential tool in determining the progress of
cardiac damage and the optimal timing of surgery. Therefore, risk stratification should be based on clinical and echocardiographic findings (Grade D). †Review frequency should be determined according to individual needs and local capacity. Most critically, the frequency of review should become more frequent in the event of symptom onset, symptomatic deterioration or a change in clinical findings. ¥Any patient with severe valvular disease or moderate to severe valvular disease with symptoms should be referred for cardiological and surgical assessment as soon as possible. ‡In patients with no evidence of valvular disease on echocardiography, who have no documented ARF recurrences, good adherence to secondary prophylaxis and no cardiac murmurs on examination at follow up appointments, echocardiography may not be needed as frequently.
BPG, benzathine penicillin G; ECG, electrocardiogram; INR, international normalised ratio. The Australian guideline for prevention, diagnosis and management of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease (2nd Edition)
Case Report Blowing a nose black and blue Matteo Gelardi, Maria Luisa Fiorella, Eustachio Tarasco, Giovanni Passalacqua, Francesco Porcelli Lancet 2009; 373: 780 In June, 2006, a 32 year-old woman, working as an architect results. Nasal smears showed no fungi, but we observed Department of Ophthalmology at the archaeological site of Pompeii, noticed that her nose black, a
About HealthDay | Email Editors | Email Sales March 14, 2008 Related Stories Preschool Intervention Curbed Trend Secondhand Smoke Hikes Tots' Toward Obesity Kids in program ate less junk food, more fruits and vegetables WEDNESDAY, March 12 (HealthDay News) -- A preschool-based weight control intervention program instilled healthy eating habits in children ag